Friday, June 10, 2011

valentines hearts images

images Big Valentine Heart Cookies valentines hearts images. How to Draw Valentine Hearts,
  • How to Draw Valentine Hearts,


  • permfiling
    10-04 10:57 PM
    I am planning to go to India with my family in december. Please suggest some tourist spots across India.
    Not the usual ones like tajmahal or gateway of india etc. Thank you.


    Well you have telanganaindia as your ID so you can visit Andhra Pradesh :-)




    wallpaper How to Draw Valentine Hearts, valentines hearts images. print this free valentines
  • print this free valentines


  • gcboy442
    08-26 10:28 AM
    Clockwork : Yes I am talking about LUD on approved
    I-140. Even I have the same date, so I was just curious. Good to know that yours is cleared. Mine may be next week....




    valentines hearts images. Valentine Heart Cards - Love
  • Valentine Heart Cards - Love


  • vicks_don
    01-23 08:22 AM
    You guys are great Leaders...




    2011 print this free valentines valentines hearts images. Valentines Heart
  • Valentines Heart


  • ganesha
    09-04 01:32 PM
    I received CPO email's for me and my son. My wife's online status is unchanged (no emails yet...). We have not received the Welcome email yet....


    Folks;

    I received an approval notification through the CRIS system of USCIS. Almost everyone who I saw got approved got a CPO and welcome message email. Don't know what to make out of it...my lawyer is also mum on the issue.

    Here is the content:

    Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS

    Current Status: Approval notice sent.

    On September 3, 2009, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.

    Also I as the primary applicant only received the mail...my wife's status is still unchanged...

    Best,

    SoP



    more...

    valentines hearts images. Feb 12 2010 12:40 AM
  • Feb 12 2010 12:40 AM


  • gcwait2007
    07-07 01:38 PM
    I have applied 485 during the july07 fiasco,I got 2 eads and aps,they have not even touched my case since april08.Is my case preadjudicated?

    If you have not yet received any RFE, you are a lucky person and your I-485 application has been filed perfectly. As per USCIS announcements, they have almost completed (99.99%) review of all pending AOS cases and pre-adjudicated most of them. I will presume that your case has been pre-adjudicated and all set to go Green whenever visa number is available.

    One way to find out whether your case been pre-adjudicated is to call USCIS thro POJ method and talk to a IO (not customer service person) and they will be able to tell you.




    valentines hearts images. Valentine hearts pictures,
  • Valentine hearts pictures,


  • ss777
    10-07 03:05 PM
    I too got transfer mails in April 2008. TSC to NSC to TSC. But when I last checked at infopass they said its at NSC. In April 2009, my approved I-140 is also transferred from TSC to NSC. Last month when I checked at infopass, they said 140 is in "Transit".
    Dont know how and where it will end up?



    more...

    valentines hearts images. Two Valentines hearts on red
  • Two Valentines hearts on red


  • Britsabroad
    February 27th, 2004, 09:36 AM
    Sounds like traffic jams might be a good place to 'trap' (Another Royal Navy term)




    2010 Valentine Heart Cards - Love valentines hearts images. Big Valentine Heart Cookies
  • Big Valentine Heart Cookies


  • rheoretro
    09-13 03:40 PM
    Please stop complaining, multiple posting of same greivance and try to do something constructive - I have been waiting for more than 5 years now too, and as frustrated as I am, I do not feel complaining will get me anywhere.

    Folks, I agree that while complaining and venting are therapeutic, they are only good up to a certain point. Don't just vent on these forums. Vent, but also try and do something constructive - help recruit new members, help raise funds for UIV, talk to your bosses at work and friends who are US citizens, and make them aware of what LEGAL immigrants who are stuck in backlogs and limboland are going through. Have them write their congressmen and senators and tell them to do something about this situation.

    Venting is a good first step, but we'll all need to be more constructive than this.



    more...

    valentines hearts images. heart valentine.
  • heart valentine.


  • sayonara
    12-13 12:14 PM
    Guys, I guess almost everybody is done with their finger printing by now.

    I think there is a significant chunk of the crowd (mostly NSC-CSC-NSC and other transfer cases) who havent got FP notices yet...so if nothing else...feel glad that you are ahead of us in the GC game...LOL




    hair Valentines Heart valentines hearts images. Swirling Valentine Hearts
  • Swirling Valentine Hearts


  • gauravsh
    05-04 01:23 PM
    :) when you are in India, you are NOT on H1B status.
    So there is nothing to stop you to work from home in India, for 5 months or 5 years :)
    The paystubs during this period is also irrelevant to USCIS regarding proof of maintaining H1 status, since you were NOT. What they care at your re-entry in H1B will be existence of valid employment in USA at that time, and proof regarding this.

    So you can apply for H1 extension, get it approved, go to India, work from there for any length, return to USA based on your H1B (it has to be valid when you return, plus you may need a valid visa stamp in your passport). There are no issues.

    But be careful if you have a pending 485 petition. Long stays outside of USA can be interpreted as lack of immigration intent. You better have a good explanation if you stay outside of USA for lengthier periods, with 485 pending.

    Thank you sir!!



    more...

    valentines hearts images. Valentine Coloring Pages
  • Valentine Coloring Pages


  • tictac
    09-08 10:32 AM
    Dear All:

    Need your advice. Filed I-485 on July 5th. I-140 is approved. Working with the employer for 6 yrs. Now that I filed for final stage, my employer wants me to sign a contract voluntarily that I should stay with them for 24 months. What are my legal options in state of CA? He wants to get 20K if I leave earlier than contract term. I signed it since he threatened me to revoke I-140. Can I backout after portability law kicks in.

    Thanks in advance.




    hot Feb 12 2010 12:40 AM valentines hearts images. Girl amp; Boy Hearts
  • Girl amp; Boy Hearts


  • pathmaker
    09-22 08:56 AM
    Hello,
    Anybody has information to offer for such a case ?
    Thanks.

    write the following on the envlope using marker
    DO NOT OPEN IN THE MAIL ROOM

    and address the package to director of the service center also include the evidance that you have applied when the visa bulliten is current



    more...

    house Candy Valentine Hearts valentines hearts images. Rhinestone Valentine Heart
  • Rhinestone Valentine Heart


  • crzyBanker
    09-24 08:21 PM
    I received my EAD but my spouse EAD did not arrive and it has been more than 2 weeks. The status says Card production Ordered.

    I have the same question should I have to wait untill the 30 days have passed to reapply for replacement ead or can I apply before?. Is there any way the process can be expedited as my spouse has to work on this EAD. Any info is really appreciated.




    tattoo Valentine hearts pictures, valentines hearts images. Free printable Valentine Heart
  • Free printable Valentine Heart


  • jatinr
    09-27 06:50 AM
    Did some one call USCIS to get receipt numbers? Any pointers to calling USCIS...what do i give as reference numbers?

    Thanks.

    FP and 485 will have same receipt number



    more...

    pictures Two Valentines hearts on red valentines hearts images. red valentines background
  • red valentines background


  • Jerrome
    02-24 01:33 PM
    Company B can not apply based on EB1, They have to apply only in EB2 or EB3.

    To Join company b you have to use
    L1
    - not possible.
    H1
    - October 2009 possibly if you get your visa
    - Green card not in EB1
    EAD
    - Not assure. Depends on Labor, 140 then 485 filing
    Last option
    - Go to india work with them for a year and comeback in L1 and then apply on EB1 must be faster. Provided you get L1 to come here. I hear now a days they are rejecting L1s left and right.




    dresses Girl amp; Boy Hearts valentines hearts images. 160+ Valentine#39;s Day scrapbook
  • 160+ Valentine#39;s Day scrapbook


  • go_guy123
    01-06 11:00 AM
    CIR is impossible with the current Congress, any legislator thinking it is a possibility is only misleading!

    "That" legislator also knows it is impossible. He/she is doing it for a poltical stunt so that he/she can go say I did try from my side.

    My belief is that this time around they will try a Dream Act - SKIL Bill combo meal to get some votes in Senate/House



    more...

    makeup heart valentine. valentines hearts images. Candy Valentine Hearts
  • Candy Valentine Hearts


  • Blog Feeds
    02-05 06:40 PM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:



    By Eleanor Pelta, AILA First Vice President

    H-1B workers certainly seem to be under fire these days on many fronts. A new memo issued by USCIS on the employer-employee relationship imposes new extra-regulatory regulations on the types of activities in which H-1B workers can engage as well as the types of enterprises that can petition for H-1B workers. The memo targets the consulting industry directly, deftly slips in a new concept that seems to prohibit H-1B petitions for employer-owners of businesses, and will surely constitute an open invitation to the Service Centers to hit H-1B petitioners with a new slew of kitchen-sink RFE's. On another front, USCIS continues to make unannounced H-1B site visits, often repeatedly to the same employer. Apart from the "in-terrorem" impact of such visits, I personally cannot see the utility of three different visits to the same employer, particularly after the first one or two visits show that the employer is fully compliant.

    But USCIS isn't the only agency that is rigorously targeting H-1B's. An AILA member recently reported that CBP pulled newly-arrived Indian nationals holding H-1B visas out of an immigration inspection line and reportedly placed them in Expedited Removal. The legal basis of those actions is still unclear. However, the tactic is too close to racial profiling for my own comfort.

    Finally, recent H-1B "skirmishes" include various U.S. consular posts in India issuing "pink letters" that are, simply put, consular "RFE's" appearing to question the bona fides of the H-1B and requesting information on a host of truly repetitive and/or irrelevant topics. Much of the information that is routinely requested on a pink letter is already in the copy of the H-1B visa petition. Some of the letters request payroll information for all employees of the sponsoring company, a ridiculous request in most instances, particularly for major multi-national companies. One of the most frustrating actions we are seeing from consular officers in this context is the checking off or highlighting of every single category of additional information on the form letter, whether directly applicable or not, in effect a "paper wall" that must be overcome before an applicant can have the H-1B visa issued. Very discouraging to both employer and employee.

    How have we come to a point in time where the H-1B category in and of itself is so disdained and mistrusted? Of course I'm aware that instances of fraud have cast this category in a bad light. But I think that vehemence of the administrative attack on the H-1B category is so disproportionate to the actual statistics about fraud. And interestingly, the disproportionate heavy-handed administrative reaction comes not from the agency specifically tasked with H-1B enforcement�the Department of Labor�but from CIS, CBP and State. Sometimes I just have to shake my head and ask myself what makes people so darn angry about a visa category that, at bottom, is designed to bring in relatively tiny number of really smart people to work in U.S. businesses of any size. It has to be a reaction against something else.

    Yes, a great number of IT consultants come to the US on H-1B's. It is important to remember that so many of these individuals are extremely well-educated, capable people, working in an industry in which there are a large number of high profile players. And arguably, the high profile consulting companies have the most at stake if they do not focus on compliance, as they are the easiest enforcement target and they need their business model to work in the U.S. in order to survive. Some people may not like the business model, although arguably IT consulting companies provide needed services that allow US businesses, such as banks and insurance companies to focus on their own core strengths. Like it or not, though, this business model is perfectly legal under current law, and the agencies that enforce our immigration laws have no business trying to eviscerate it by policy or a pattern of discretionary actions.

    It is true that some IT consulting companies' practices have been the focus of fraud investigations. But DOL has stringent rules in place to deal with the bad guys. Benching H-1B workers without pay, paying below the prevailing wage, sending H-1B workers on long-term assignments to a site not covered by an LCA�these are the practices we most often hear about, and every single one of these is a violation of an existing regulation that could be enforced by the Department of Labor. When an employer violates wage and hour rules, DOL investigates the practices and enforces the regulations against that employer. But no one shuts down an entire industry as a result.

    And the IT consulting industry is not the only user of the H-1B visa. Let's not forget how many other critical fields use H-1B workers. In my own career alone, I have seen H-1B petitions for nanoscientists, ornithologists, CEO's of significant not for profit organizations, teachers, applied mathematicians, risk analysts, professionals involved in pharmaceutical research and development, automotive designers, international legal experts, film editors, microimaging engineers. H-1B's are valuable to small and large businesses alike, arguably even more to that emerging business that needs one key expert to develop a new product or service and get the business off the ground.


    The assault on H-1B's is not only offensive, it's dangerous. Here's why:




    H-1B's create jobs�statistics show that 5 jobs are created in the U.S. for every H-1B worker hired. An administrative clamp-down in the program will hinder this job creation. And think about the valuable sharing of skills and expertise between H-1B workers and U.S. workers�this is lost when companies are discouraged from using the program.
    The anti-H-1B assault dissuades large businesses from conducting research and development in the US, and encourages the relocation of those facilities in jurisdictions that are friendlier to foreign professionals.
    The anti-H-1B assault chills the formation of small businesses in the US, particularly in emerging technologies. This will most certainly be one of the long-term results of USCIS' most recent memo.
    The attack on H-1B's offends our friends and allies in the world. An example: Earlier this year India �one of the U.S.'s closest allies --announced new visa restrictions on foreign nationals working there. Surely the treatment of Indian national H-1B workers at the hands of our agencies involved in the immigration process would not have escaped the attention of the Indian government as they issued their own restrictions.
    The increasing challenges in the H-1B program may have the effect of encouraging foreign students who were educated in the U.S. to seek permanent positions elsewhere.
    Whatever the cause of the visceral reaction against H-1B workers might be�whether it stems from a fear that fraud will become more widespread or whether it is simply a broader reaction against foreign workers that often raises its head during any down economy �I sincerely hope that the agencies are able to gain some perspective on the program that allows them to treat legitimate H-1B employers and employees with the respect they deserve and to effectively enforce against those who are non-compliant, rather than casting a wide net and treating all H-1B users as abusers.
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7575642888668204601?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-is-h-1b-dirty-word.html)




    girlfriend Free printable Valentine Heart valentines hearts images. valentine hearts love special
  • valentine hearts love special


  • truthinspector
    01-25 03:12 PM
    I do not think it would be prudent of Indian (or any other foreign) government to do so. The best they can do it to try to lure the NRIs back to India. Any effort to request immigration reforms at a government level would not be a dignified action.

    The US government may (albeit privately) wonder as to why these foreign governments cannot make mends with their own system so that people do not choose to immigrate in the first place. I do not think a sensible foreign policy on Indian side would let such a talk happen.

    Is it a bad idea to ask for help from the indian government, there are ministers like "Minister for Overseas Indian Affairs - Vayalar Ravi" who is supposed to ...........




    hairstyles Valentine Coloring Pages valentines hearts images. heart valentine. day hearts,
  • heart valentine. day hearts,


  • helpful_leo
    02-03 12:50 AM
    What is the process of suggesting amendments to bills under consideration to lawmakers, e.g. the amendments to PACE suggested in my previous post- can I call/e-mail/fax all sponsors/lawmakers or can I only contact specific lawmakers (those of my area)? Any suggestions will be welcome!




    gk_2000
    12-02 07:22 PM
    The bill also says...

    1. The illegal's application needs to be processed expeditiously.
    2. The USCIS can not increase the fee for that

    Means...the 2 million illegals will be put ahead of the legals who are rotting in line for years. To process these docs, USCIS needs more resource and needs to hire more people but they can not increase the fee. So USCIS will come after the legals and increase their fee. These democrats wants to rob legals and reward illegas.

    and you are hoping once this bill passed they will consider us...YOU MADE MY DAY.

    so WTFs

    Hopefully, the bill would have been vetted enough by the time it passes, and these areas cleaned up. This would be a good test for the US political system




    wandmaker
    10-30 02:33 PM
    Read this - http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/Infopassfe0405.pdf

    What does taking Infopass mean?

    Thank you.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment