sangmami
06-13 11:23 PM
My husband is in the same position too.He is a fellow and got a job to start in 2008 july.lc dne.i 140 pending..
Can he file for i 485....ead for a future job...this has been in our head since this evening....cant wait till tomorrow morning to ask the lawyer:rolleyes:
can any1 explain this?
thanks.
CONGRATS to all to can file for i 485
Can he file for i 485....ead for a future job...this has been in our head since this evening....cant wait till tomorrow morning to ask the lawyer:rolleyes:
can any1 explain this?
thanks.
CONGRATS to all to can file for i 485
wallpaper location as silas botwin
gc_hanged
01-05 06:22 AM
After The Fall: Making Sense Out Of Sensenbrenner by Gary Endelman (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2006,0104-endelman.shtm#bio)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
cr125rider
04-16 01:45 AM
That is the sprite of link walking right, this one is a WIP, got some font and organization issues. Thanks for the condtructive feedback RadioactiveChimp *sarcasm*. Thanks Kman.
2011 Slideshow#39;Weeds#39; Season 6
mhtanim
04-07 02:36 PM
I think this memo is about NATURALIZATION - so yes it's about Citizenship, not for GCs or I-485s.
more...
h1bdude1
04-20 11:04 PM
Hello guys,
I am sending my family based I-485 on May 1. currently i am on h1b . My h1b approval (I-797A) is valid till April 15, 2009. my h1b extension is already pending with USCIS. My Question is :::----
Is there gonna be any problem with USCIS since my h1b approval already expired?? what will be my status after i filled my I-485?? Can i legally stay in US after filing family based I-485 even my h1b extension get denied.???
thanks
h1bdude1
I am sending my family based I-485 on May 1. currently i am on h1b . My h1b approval (I-797A) is valid till April 15, 2009. my h1b extension is already pending with USCIS. My Question is :::----
Is there gonna be any problem with USCIS since my h1b approval already expired?? what will be my status after i filled my I-485?? Can i legally stay in US after filing family based I-485 even my h1b extension get denied.???
thanks
h1bdude1
sendmailtojk
04-09 03:35 PM
Gurus,
I am filing a ***new*** I-765 application this week. On the USCIS website, I saw following notice. Is it true?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Filing Fee :
$340
Special Instructions :
If you filed a Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, on July 30, 2007, or after, then no fee is required to file a request for employment authorization on Form I-765. You may file the I-765 concurrently with your I-485, or you may submit the I-765 at a later date. If you file Form I-765 separately, you must also submit a copy of your Form I-797C, Notice of Action, receipt as evidence of the filing of an I-485.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers
I am filing a ***new*** I-765 application this week. On the USCIS website, I saw following notice. Is it true?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Filing Fee :
$340
Special Instructions :
If you filed a Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, on July 30, 2007, or after, then no fee is required to file a request for employment authorization on Form I-765. You may file the I-765 concurrently with your I-485, or you may submit the I-765 at a later date. If you file Form I-765 separately, you must also submit a copy of your Form I-797C, Notice of Action, receipt as evidence of the filing of an I-485.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers
more...
H1B-GC
06-24 04:15 PM
Thanks all for your replies!
2010 Weeds Season 6 Episode 13
tammman
07-21 12:57 PM
Thaks a lot, good to know there is someone out there who did this.
So u think it shudnt be an issue.
I moving to more or less big firm....
So when I get the offer just make sure they know that I want to go for AC21 ? thats all ?
So u think it shudnt be an issue.
I moving to more or less big firm....
So when I get the offer just make sure they know that I want to go for AC21 ? thats all ?
more...
lonedesi
09-22 02:48 PM
http://www.immigration-law.com/
Under Breaking News
Under Breaking News
hair Keep watching Weeds Season 5.
stupendousman11
12-04 03:31 PM
I have usually asked my HR to give me a letter covering the following details in the employment letter to avoid unnecessary questions at POE:
Name
Designation
Location
Salary
Job responsibilities/description
Employed as H1
Indication that you are out of the country for a short time and intend to come back to rejoin the company
Name
Designation
Location
Salary
Job responsibilities/description
Employed as H1
Indication that you are out of the country for a short time and intend to come back to rejoin the company
more...
Suva
03-26 10:48 AM
What is NIW?
hot tags: weeds, silas botwin,
go2roomshare
03-29 11:54 AM
any help gurus
more...
house Tags:showtime, weeds
eagerr2i
11-10 06:07 PM
You can find noraties always at the nearest "Mailboxes Etc".. in the town; they are pricey though at $ 10 per attestation, else you should check your legal department in your work place.
tattoo watch weeds season 5 episode 1
gc_lover
07-03 02:36 PM
I think its too early to get any fedex back, maybe from next week!
more...
pictures Six chace crawford from weeds
delax
07-17 02:32 PM
AILF's Legal Action Center has a class action lawsuit completed and ready to file against the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State for their unlawful actions in the I-485 / Visa Bulletin mess. The government improperly denied tens of thousands of intending immigrants the opportunity to apply for employment-based visas known as "green cards."
Rumors continue today that the Administration will be announcing a decision regarding their proposal to resolve the crisis. The most recent rumors indicate that the announcement will be made today. However, there are widely varying reports on what the proposed solution will be.
AILF will review any proposals by the Administration to resolve this issue, and will determine the best course of action in light of those proposals. While we remain hopeful that the Administration will take the actions necessary to avoid the filing of the lawsuit, further delays or incomplete solutions will compel us to move forward with litigation.
We thank the hundreds of people - intending immigrants and their lawyers - who have contacted us to be plaintiffs and support the litigation. We received emails and calls from more than 500 people in the last two weeks. Your efforts have enabled us to prepare a very strong challenge to the government's actions.
We will post more information as soon as it is available.
Rumors continue today that the Administration will be announcing a decision regarding their proposal to resolve the crisis. The most recent rumors indicate that the announcement will be made today. However, there are widely varying reports on what the proposed solution will be.
AILF will review any proposals by the Administration to resolve this issue, and will determine the best course of action in light of those proposals. While we remain hopeful that the Administration will take the actions necessary to avoid the filing of the lawsuit, further delays or incomplete solutions will compel us to move forward with litigation.
We thank the hundreds of people - intending immigrants and their lawyers - who have contacted us to be plaintiffs and support the litigation. We received emails and calls from more than 500 people in the last two weeks. Your efforts have enabled us to prepare a very strong challenge to the government's actions.
We will post more information as soon as it is available.
dresses Weeds Season 6 Episode 3
amsgc
06-13 09:14 PM
Hi,
Thanks FactoryMan. I had a similar question. My thought is that if the spouse is a dependent, then it shouldn't matter what status s/he is, as long is it is legal.
The next question is, suppose we apply for EAD, but the spouse's current student status expires before receiving the EAD, do they fall out of status?
Thanks,
Ams
Thanks FactoryMan. I had a similar question. My thought is that if the spouse is a dependent, then it shouldn't matter what status s/he is, as long is it is legal.
The next question is, suppose we apply for EAD, but the spouse's current student status expires before receiving the EAD, do they fall out of status?
Thanks,
Ams
more...
makeup $10.99. Free Shipping
svermani
04-05 07:35 PM
Thanks Hasil.
Anyone else who can tell me about a good attorney in Chicago area, it is urgent for me to contact a good attorney as there is a mistake in 485 application.
Thanks...
Anyone else who can tell me about a good attorney in Chicago area, it is urgent for me to contact a good attorney as there is a mistake in 485 application.
Thanks...
girlfriend TV Shows - Weeds - Season 5
satishku_2000
09-22 12:37 AM
Hi,
My pending I-140 (filed an year ago...June 2006) was transferred from TSC to NSC on 09/05/2007, because my I-485 was filed with NSC. What date willl NSC use as received date to process my case...the date they received from TSC or the original receipt date?
Isn't it(140 filed at TSC almost an year ago) supposed to be certified by now?
TSC has been much faster at certifying 140s . Looks like USCIS is transferrring the 140s from TSC ... I can only pray for alll concurrent fileres that filed at TSC ...
140s at NSC are almost taking an year according to latest processing times.
Just curious did you have an RFE?
My pending I-140 (filed an year ago...June 2006) was transferred from TSC to NSC on 09/05/2007, because my I-485 was filed with NSC. What date willl NSC use as received date to process my case...the date they received from TSC or the original receipt date?
Isn't it(140 filed at TSC almost an year ago) supposed to be certified by now?
TSC has been much faster at certifying 140s . Looks like USCIS is transferrring the 140s from TSC ... I can only pray for alll concurrent fileres that filed at TSC ...
140s at NSC are almost taking an year according to latest processing times.
Just curious did you have an RFE?
hairstyles Weeds Season 5 DVD Release
go2roomshare
03-29 10:03 AM
Employer A with EB3 PD Feb2003 and I 485 filed
Same Employer A is doing EB2 PERM with I 140 PD porting
Is it possible to invoke AC21 in middle of process??
1. is it possible to use AC21 after 140 approval??, any time constraints?
2. what about between 140 filing and 140 approval?
3. at what stage it is not safe?
any advice please
Same Employer A is doing EB2 PERM with I 140 PD porting
Is it possible to invoke AC21 in middle of process??
1. is it possible to use AC21 after 140 approval??, any time constraints?
2. what about between 140 filing and 140 approval?
3. at what stage it is not safe?
any advice please
sammywammy
04-27 10:24 PM
The lawyers did some mixup/goofup and I lost my June 2002 PD. Here is the sequence of events.
Original Labor (Labor1)
PD: June 2002
Category: EB3 (incorrectly filed at that time by lawyers)
State: CA
We didn’t hear about the whereabouts of my labor1 case because it was sent to the Backlog Processing center (all cases after May 2002 were sent)
So the lawyers suggested filing a new labor under PERM.
Second Labor (Labor2)
PD: Oct 2005
Category: EB2
Approved: in December 2005
Second I140
Approved: in December 2005/Early 2006
Received Original Labor Approval in end of Dec 2006
The lawyers decided to combine the 2 cases and file for I-485.
i.e. use the ORIGINAL Labor PD and SECOND Labor EB2.
In April 2007, 485 application was open for “EB2” – “June 2002”.
So the lawyers filed for concurrent I-485 and I-140 for the ORIGINAL EB3 case (they submitted Second Approved EB2 I-140 along with it)
ORIGINAL I-140 was approved in Oct 2007
PLEASE NOTE: the unique situation is that the SECOND I140 was approved before the ORIGINAL I140.
Since April, 2007 - We were told by my company lawyers that the 485 is under process EB2 PD June 2002.
The GC Visa number have been available for EB2 PD June 2002 for a long time now.
But we still hadn’t received our Greencard for a long time and were wondering what is causing this delay.
So after much ado by our lawyers, they agreed to check with USCIS.
Because the Second I140 was approved before the First I1-40, USCIS said that we cannot use old PD
According to our lawyers, Now our current case status is “supposedly” OCT 2005 EB2. So we lost the June 2002 PD.
Is there anyway to recapture the old PD? (with or without refilling I-485)
Any suggestions,help or insight will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards
Sam
Original Labor (Labor1)
PD: June 2002
Category: EB3 (incorrectly filed at that time by lawyers)
State: CA
We didn’t hear about the whereabouts of my labor1 case because it was sent to the Backlog Processing center (all cases after May 2002 were sent)
So the lawyers suggested filing a new labor under PERM.
Second Labor (Labor2)
PD: Oct 2005
Category: EB2
Approved: in December 2005
Second I140
Approved: in December 2005/Early 2006
Received Original Labor Approval in end of Dec 2006
The lawyers decided to combine the 2 cases and file for I-485.
i.e. use the ORIGINAL Labor PD and SECOND Labor EB2.
In April 2007, 485 application was open for “EB2” – “June 2002”.
So the lawyers filed for concurrent I-485 and I-140 for the ORIGINAL EB3 case (they submitted Second Approved EB2 I-140 along with it)
ORIGINAL I-140 was approved in Oct 2007
PLEASE NOTE: the unique situation is that the SECOND I140 was approved before the ORIGINAL I140.
Since April, 2007 - We were told by my company lawyers that the 485 is under process EB2 PD June 2002.
The GC Visa number have been available for EB2 PD June 2002 for a long time now.
But we still hadn’t received our Greencard for a long time and were wondering what is causing this delay.
So after much ado by our lawyers, they agreed to check with USCIS.
Because the Second I140 was approved before the First I1-40, USCIS said that we cannot use old PD
According to our lawyers, Now our current case status is “supposedly” OCT 2005 EB2. So we lost the June 2002 PD.
Is there anyway to recapture the old PD? (with or without refilling I-485)
Any suggestions,help or insight will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards
Sam
miguy
07-17 09:55 AM
does the employment letter have to be exactly in the same format as described in 'filing your 485 on your own thread' or can it be a simple letter stating the job title, salary, responsibilities etc?........is it ok to file 485 on my own eventhough the rest of the process was handled by attorney?.......for any immigration matters my company just forwards me to their lawyer.......and there is chance the lawyer might get pissed off if I file 485 on my own.......any ideas?
No comments:
Post a Comment